awesome-ai-prompts

load testing

One prompt from the awesome-ai-prompts catalog, ready to paste into your AI coding agent.

Copy-paste the block below into any AI coding agent to design and run load tests with measurable thresholds and reproducible results, not a one-off "it felt fast" test.

Keywords: load testing, stress test, throughput, capacity, latency under load, benchmark

Design and run load tests for `[endpoint / service / workflow]` in this
repository. The goal: measurable performance under load with clear pass/fail
thresholds, not just "it didn't crash."

## Steps

1. **Identify what to test** - Read the code to find the critical paths that
   need load testing: high-traffic endpoints, resource-intensive operations,
   database-heavy queries, or integrations with external services. Prioritize
   by business impact and expected traffic.
2. **Define realistic scenarios** - Model real user behavior: the mix of
   requests (read vs write), think time between requests, authentication
   patterns, and data volume. Use realistic payloads, not minimal test data.
   Consider both normal load and peak load scenarios.
3. **Choose the tool** - Use the repo's existing load testing tooling if it
   exists (k6, locust, Apache Bench, wrk, artillery). If none exists, pick the
   standard tool for the stack and set it up.
4. **Set thresholds** - Define measurable pass/fail criteria before running:
   - Response time: p50, p95, p99 latencies under load
   - Throughput: requests per second sustained
   - Error rate: maximum acceptable percentage (e.g. < 0.1%)
   - Resource usage: CPU, memory, connection pool limits
5. **Run the tests** - Execute against a staging or local environment that
   mirrors production. Run warm-up iterations first. Capture and save the full
   results with timestamps.
6. **Analyze and report** - Compare results against thresholds. Identify
   bottlenecks: database queries, connection pool exhaustion, memory leaks, or
   external service latency. Provide before/after numbers if making
   optimization changes.

## Verification

- [ ] The tested paths were chosen from the code, and the user mix matches real
      traffic.
- [ ] Data volumes are representative of production, not toy fixtures.
- [ ] Pass/fail thresholds were defined before the run.
- [ ] The run happened against staging or local, never production without
      explicit approval.
- [ ] Results are reported against the thresholds, including the ones that
      failed.
- [ ] Any difference between the test environment and production is documented.

## Rules

- Never run load tests against production without explicit approval and a
  maintenance window.
- Never report results without thresholds - "it handled 1000 rps" means nothing
  without knowing if that's enough.
- Never use toy data volumes that don't represent real usage patterns.
- If the test environment differs significantly from production, document the
  differences and how they affect the results.

More security-performance prompts